Friday, November 20, 2009

If it ain't broke...fix it??

When I was a young boy I used to tear down all manner of things just to see how they worked. Not all of these things got back together and went back into service, but my father was an indulgent man and kept bringing me more things to examine. Eventually he brought me things that already didn't work, with the stated expectation that they should work when I was finished with them. For a young boy it was a fine way to learn about how the things in the world worked.

As I was moving through this review of all things, I would occasionally see signs and bumper stickers saying "If it ain't broke, don't fix it." I wondered about that motto. Later I would have engineering bosses who would say, "first prove to me that we have a real problem before you redesign that thing" (to fix a supposed problem based on one telephone call from the field). I learned from them too, and came to understand that they were essentially saying "If it ain't broke don't fix it."

Too late in life I began to take an interest in politics. Before that interest, I kind of understood that out there in the world somewhere there were "others", Nazis and Socialists and Communists. I even ducked a few communist bullets in my misspent youth, but I always had the feeling that those kind of people would never come to my homeland. I had to go to their homeland and fight them there.

As I grew older, I finally understood that "If it ain't broke don't fix it" really meant that lots of things work for reasons we may never fully understand, but if they work and we should respect them nonetheless.

As I studied the behavior of the socialists and communists, I detected a variation on "If it ain't broke don't fix it" Their motto was "If it ain't broke they won't let us fix it" So, "We need to break it first, then they will let us fix it." Socialism and communism cannot easily replace economic and governmental systems that work fairly well. Furthermore, almost all economic and governmental systems tend to work better than socialism and communism unless they are sabotaged.

And that is the point, or at least it is the question. Is our present administration, with their very socialist agenda, trying to fix things, or are they trying to break them? We are told now that our imbalance of trade and our ever increasing deficit are a big problem, big enough to destroy our way of life. Why then are we prevented from exploiting our own energy reserves? Is that so we have to send dollars to our Muslim enemies and aggravate the trade imbalance? Why have we made so many restrictive regulations on our own industry. Was that so we would export our industry and jobs to our arch enemy Communist China? Why are we contemplating cap and trade legislation that can only offer economic destruction? Communist China and India are not stupid enough to join us in this economic suicide. Without them, there will be no significant reduction in carbon dioxide emissions so why are we intent on destroying the rest of our industrial base? Why is our government spending money at a truly shocking rate, thereby driving up the deficit and driving down the dollar? Why are we promoting the largest entitlement program in our history at a time when the government borrows almost half of all the money it spends?

Are the people in power at the moment trying to fix things.... or are they trying to break them? Have they reasoned that first they must break the system and then we the people will beg them to fix it? Good question. It is, after all, the socialist and communist way of gaining power and then keeping it.

By: Jerry



Tom Wells said...

Jerry's right --- and we aren't paying enough attention to the systematic dismantling of a working system. Why is that? Here's a thought:

My VERY politically incorrect father used to use a ploy to "man up" my brother and me when we were quite young. If we ran into the house whining about some minor scrape or bruise, he would assess the situation quickly. Provided we weren't in need of a doctor, he would listen to us whimper a bit and then lean over and perhaps snap us behind our ear, or some similar "stimulus." When we said "Ouch!" and grabbed the ear, he'd say, "See? Forgot all about that bruise, didn't you!"

Aside from the fact that in today's age he'd probably be reported and jailed for such "abuse", this points out some of what is going on here. As they go about breaking things to fix them, they need diversions - hence Eric Holder bringing KSM to New York to be tried in Civil Court. That's a snap behind the ear to get everybody concentrating on something else --- while Obama, Reid and Pelosi perpetrate the destruction of the system.

gxm said...

“…I always had the feeling that those kind of people would never come to my homeland…”

They have been here all along in the education system, the MSM, government, etc. working away to undermine the system and the Constitution. That’s cultural Marxism a la Antonio Gramsci. Now that they have substantial power (or think they do) they can do the following and finish off the hated constitutional democratic republic and market capitalism.

“The best way to destroy the capitalist system is to debauch the currency."

"The way to crush the bourgeoisie is to grind them between the millstones of taxation and inflation."

- Vladimir Ilyich Lenin

watchbird1 said...

A thought-provoking, well written post.